Viruses

Viruses are protein bodies synthesized by individual cells. Aajonus described them as solvents or soaps comparable to laundry detergent or muriatic acid in their function, substances that dissolve and disassemble matter without being alive themselves. He used the phrase "body soaps" interchangeably with "solvents" to communicate that cells manufacture these protein structures for specific cleansing tasks in the same way that humans manufacture soap to clean laundry. Saying viruses are contagious, he said, is exactly like saying laundry soap is contagious because it is found in every home across a city.

He later refined his terminology, noting that the word "solvent" was confusing to some people and that "enzyme fractionators" was more accurate. He drew a comparison to digestive hydrochloric acid: just as hydrochloric acid does not obliterate food but rather fractionates molecular particles so that bacteria can consume them, a virus goes into contaminated tissue, separates its molecular components, and allows the debris to be carried out of the body. The virus does not eat the tissue in the sense that bacteria eat tissue. It dismantles, dissolves, and fractionates it.

Viruses contain DNA because cells use their own internal substances, including DNA, to synthesize the virus. The presence of DNA in a viral particle is not evidence that the virus is alive or self-directing; it is simply a consequence of the materials the cell used to construct it.

Cells resort to virus production only when the tissue they need to cleanse is so contaminated with non-bioactive chemicals, industrial pollutants, pharmaceutical residues, processed food byproducts, heavy metals, or other toxic substances that bacteria, fungi, and parasites cannot survive feeding on it. Aajonus used the analogy of a field heavily treated with arsenic growing apples: if an apple from that field is eaten, the consumer is poisoned. In the same way, bacteria or parasites that attempt to consume a cell heavily saturated with cadmium, lead, mercury, or industrial chemical residues will die before they can accomplish their work. They do not multiply; they perish.

When the body cannot deploy its living janitors, it falls back on the solvent process. This is why, Aajonus explained, viruses are predominantly a phenomenon of industrialized, heavily toxified populations. In tribal communities and in nature generally, he observed that viruses are rare. The bird community was the one consistent exception he noted, and he attributed that to birds' constant exposure to environmental contamination. Industrialized humans, whose cells are saturated with processed food chemicals, pharmaceutical agents, vaccines, and environmental pollution, regularly require viral detoxification because their bodies cannot sustain bacterial, fungal, or parasitic cleansing in the affected tissues.

He identified the flu as predominantly viral detoxification. Most humans, he said, are too toxic to cleanse naturally with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, and so their bodies turn to viruses. He urged people not to suppress flu processes with drugs, because the flu is the body completing a necessary cleansing cycle. Rejoicing through a flu and supporting the body nutritionally, he said, is followed by increased vitality.

One of Aajonus's most detailed claims about viruses is their extraordinary specificity. He stated that there are 300,000 varieties of virus in the human body at minimum, and in some sources he cited figures of 320,000 or 500,000 depending on the type of cell and the level of analysis. Each variety is specific to a particular tissue, a particular zone within the body, or a particular component within a cell.

He organized the zones of viral activity as intracellular, extracellular, and the body as a whole, with specific organ systems and glands constituting their own zones. A virus working on the outer membrane of an artery is different from one working on the interior connective tissue of that same artery. He cited the example that approximately 25 to 26 different viruses are specific to just the outer arterial membrane, each one pulling apart a different structural component. This level of specificity exists precisely because if all 300,000 viruses activated simultaneously, the entire body would dissolve. He noted that Ebola represents a case where something very close to this happens, and he identified Ebola as man-made.

Within a single arm, he said, there could be 2,000 varieties of viruses working locally on the cells surrounding specific tissues in that area. The connective tissue in one part of an arm differs structurally from the connective tissue in a joint or adjacent structure, so a different virus is required for each. This is also why, he explained, the medical community observes viruses "changing shape" and labels them retroviruses: the cell is not producing the same virus repeatedly; it is producing successive, different viruses as it works through successive layers of contaminated tissue. Each virus addresses a specific structural component, completes its dissolution, and the cell then produces a different virus to address the next component.

Aajonus stated that no virus lives longer than 24 to 72 hours. He said this in multiple sessions: the virus that exists today will not exist in three days. Within 72 hours, the virus has changed completely and is a different virus. The original virus is extinct.

This has a direct implication for flu vaccines that he returned to repeatedly. A vaccine produced for a specific viral strain is specific to a virus that was already 18 months to three years obsolete at the time of distribution. The pharmaceutical industry, he said, is fully aware of this. The virus targeted by any given vaccine ceased to exist years before the vaccine reached the public. He described this as the biggest scam in the world and as something the pharmaceutical industry knows perfectly well, making the flu vaccine business, in his view, a deliberate racket.

The reason viruses change so rapidly is that the cell producing them is working through a sequence of different contaminated structures. Once a particular virus has done its work on one specific tissue component, that task is complete and the cell produces a new virus for the next component. The virus does not persist, does not evolve in the biological sense, and does not accumulate. It appears, does its specific job within a 24 to 72-hour window, and is gone.

Aajonus was consistent that viral detoxification, while necessary when no other option exists, is the worst and most burdensome way for the body to cleanse itself. The reason is that solvents, unlike living organisms, do not reduce the volume or toxicity of what they break down. When bacteria, fungi, or parasites consume contaminated tissue, they reduce it from full volume to one to five percent waste product. The contamination is genuinely diminished. The living janitors eat the matter and leave behind a small and manageable residue.

When a virus dissolves contaminated tissue, the total volume of toxic material is not reduced. It is distributed throughout the body's fluids. He used the example of putting a solvent on a greasy garage floor and mixing it with water: the result is one to two gallons of toxic, contaminated fluid that then has to be dealt with. Nothing has been neutralized. The grease has been spread into the solvent medium. This contaminated fluid now has to leave the body somehow, and the body must use nutrients to bind with it and facilitate elimination.

This is why viral detoxification produces far more discharge than bacterial or parasitical detoxification. Aajonus listed the discharge routes: tear ducts, ear canals, gums, tongue, salivary glands, and mucous membranes all become active elimination routes during viral processes because the body is attempting to export the dissolved toxic fluid as rapidly as possible. He noted that viral wastes are greater and produce more discharge from all of these routes than the comparatively tidy process of bacterial breakdown.

The metabolic cost also manifests in chronic fatigue, lethargy, depression, and anxiety, because when the body is spending its resources on this more difficult form of detoxification, the individual experiences the depletion. Aajonus described the sequencing of viral detoxification as one where the body is trying to clean matter that its better-equipped cleansers could not handle, and the process demands more fluid, more time, and leaves more residue in the system.

He elaborated on the swelling that accompanies viral activity: viruses cause swelling because the dissolved cellular contents create fluid accumulation. He noted this is particularly dangerous in the meningeal tissue, where extreme swelling from viral activity creates the possibility of damaging or rupturing the consciousness center, which can lead to coma, aneurysm, or broken blood vessels in the brain. His recommendation in cases of severe headache accompanying viral activity was to lie on the back and place two hot water bottles on either side of the head.

The impossibility of viral contagion is a structural argument in Aajonus's framework, not merely a dispute about evidence. Since viruses are not alive, they cannot infect, cannot invade, and cannot self-replicate in any environment. He described his laboratory experiments in detail: he placed viruses in petri dishes that were fertile, meaning they contained fluid capable of sustaining cell life. The viruses did not multiply. Not one additional viral particle appeared. He extended this observation: petri dishes containing viruses and no cells, left for two years, showed no increase in viral particles at the end of that two-year period.

When he added live cells to those same conditions, viral particles increased. But this, he said, is because cells manufacture viruses. The cells in the petri dish were in a sterile, artificial, toxic-for-them environment and therefore needed to produce viruses to self-cleanse. The medical community observed this multiplication and declared that viruses self-replicate. His counter was direct: cells make viruses, just as humans make soap. Finding more soap in a city with more households does not mean the soap self-replicated. It means more households produced it.

He also offered an alternative explanation for why many people in the same community develop similar viral symptoms simultaneously. Because large populations consume the same processed foods with the same toxic byproducts, the same chemical agricultural residues, and the same industrial pollutants, and because they live under the same climatic conditions that influence which bacterial and viral detoxification cycles the body initiates, it is entirely predictable that many people will need to detoxify similar tissues at similar times. Climate, he said, affects which viruses a body will produce. Seasonal viral activity reflects seasonal detoxification cycles, not contagion.

Aajonus made a distinction between naturally produced body viruses and viruses engineered in laboratories. He identified AIDS and Ebola as man-made and cited Dr. Robert Strecker as his primary source on the AIDS question. He described Strecker as an oncologist with approximately five doctorates who was hired by an insurance company in San Francisco to study AIDS because the company was preparing to insure a workforce that was approximately 60 percent homosexual.

Strecker's investigation involved fractionating the AIDS virus protein structure. When he applied a chemical to the protein network of a natural virus, it fractionates into five parts. The AIDS virus consistently fractionated into two parts, which Strecker recognized as characteristic of man-made construction. He then took the two opposite halves and spliced together the two sides from two separate viral structures, identifying them as the lymphonomic virus of a sheep and the leukemic virus of a bovine. He combined the names of those two diseases in fifteen different possible arrangements until one of those arrangements matched an existing disease name. Aajonus used this account to argue that AIDS is a deliberately constructed pathogen, not a naturally arising virus.

He also cited Dr. Leonard Horowitz as a source of evidence that HIV, West Nile virus, and SARS were developed by military programs for germ warfare purposes.

Regarding man-made viruses generally, Aajonus said that in a person in a very weakened state of health, it is possible to propagate an introduced virus if the body needs it. How the body handles it depends on the condition of the body and what that body is fed. Man-made viruses can be dangerous to a weakened immune system in someone who does not eat properly.

Aajonus was categorical that viruses do not self-replicate outside of cells. This was based on his own laboratory observations, which he described as directed and observed work. In no instance did he find evidence of viruses reproducing outside a cellular environment. He stated that the increase of viral substances found in the blood correlates directly to the amount released when cells burst, expelling their viral contents into the bloodstream, from which the body can then deploy them to work on other damaged cells elsewhere.

When a cell's contamination level reaches a breaking point, it effectively bursts, releasing all the viruses it has produced into the bloodstream. Those viruses can then be carried to and used on other damaged cells that need the same kind of dissolution. This is not contagion. It is the body's internal distribution system deploying cleaning agents to areas that need them, using the blood as the transport medium.

This is also why what the medical community calls a viral load increasing in the blood does not mean the virus is multiplying. It means more cells are bursting and releasing previously produced viral material.

Aajonus devoted considerable attention to explaining why laboratory findings on viruses have been systematically misread. Petri dishes, he explained, are not natural environments for cells. The conditions in a petri dish, even a so-called fertile one, are artificial and toxic to the cells placed in them. Cells in such an environment cannot use their normal detoxification methods involving bacteria, fungi, and parasites, because those methods require the complex chemistry of a living body. Stripped of those options, cells in a petri dish revert to viral production as their only available self-cleansing mechanism.

So when researchers place a virus in a petri dish and add cells, and then observe an increase in viral particles, they are observing the cells manufacturing new viruses in response to their toxic, sterile, unnatural environment, not the original virus self-replicating. Aajonus described this interpretive error as not merely ignorant but stupid, saying that any researcher who went through a month of medical training on viruses and came away believing they self-replicate was not paying attention. He noted that a full month of medical training is devoted to viruses and that the structural facts about what a virus is, no nucleus, no respiratory system, no digestive system, not alive, were clearly taught and then apparently discarded in practice.

He also pointed out that in a petri dish, animal cells are poisoned and destroyed by the unnatural conditions, and the cells then begin manufacturing viruses as their response. The researchers observe this and declare that the injected virus caused the cells to become infected and start replicating the virus. What actually happened, in Aajonus's account, is that the cells were poisoned by the petri dish environment and manufactured viruses to address their own contamination.

Aajonus stated that every image of a virus ever disseminated in medical and popular literature is computer-generated art, not a photograph. He referred to these images repeatedly as Walt Disney or Disneyland creations. He said viruses have amoeba-like shapes with wart-like protrusions or tentacles in the images, which are all artistically generated to look like living things, but that no actual photograph of a virus exists because viruses are not alive and what is present in any tissue sample is dissolved cellular debris, RNA and DNA fragments, and chemical residues of the disintegration process.

He was aware that this claim is startling and repeated it in multiple workshops, noting that for 60 to 80 years before the pharmaceutical industry's commercial reframing, doctors who found degenerative tissue dissolving without any bacterial or parasitical activity present knew they were looking at a viral process and also knew there was nothing alive there, nothing to give antibiotics to, nothing to kill. The knowledge that viruses are not alive was settled medicine until commercial incentives reversed it.

Aajonus identified flu specifically as a predominantly viral detoxification event. Because most humans in industrialized societies are too toxic to cleanse with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, their bodies produce flu as a viral cleansing process. He described flu as omnipresent in industrialized populations for this reason.

He explained that flu processes address accumulated stored toxins and allow for a cleaner-running body afterward. Increased vitality follows a flu that is allowed to complete naturally without drug suppression. He explicitly said to rejoice through flu processes and to eat a healthful diet that supports rather than interrupts the process.

He described the waste products of a flu process as producing discharge from all available mucous membrane routes: tear ducts, ear wax, gums, tongue, and salivary glands all participate in expelling the large volume of dissolved toxic fluid that viral detoxification generates.

Bird flu, swine flu, and other named flu varieties he dismissed entirely. Swine flu and bird flu, he said, are simply animal tissue dissolved by a solvent, not by bacteria, parasites, or fungi, and they are not transmissible from animal populations to humans in the way claimed. You cannot get bird flu or swine flu because the process is a solvent action, not a contagious living pathogen.

The flu vaccine, in Aajonus's framework, is not merely ineffective but is fundamentally nonsensical at a structural level. Since every virus exists for 24 to 72 hours at maximum and then ceases to exist as that virus, any vaccine produced for a specific viral strain is aimed at a target that no longer exists. The 18-month to three-year timeline between identifying a viral strain and distributing a vaccine means the vaccine is always aimed at an extinct target.

He said flatly that the pharmaceutical industry knows this. If it knows that the virus targeted by the vaccine is already obsolete by the time the vaccine ships, then the vaccine program is a deliberate commercial fraud. He described the avian flu vaccine program specifically: he said the vaccine being prepared for distribution was a relabeled swine flu preparation that had been sitting in vaults because $7 billion had already been spent on it during one period and an additional $8 billion under Bush. Rather than waste the investment, the contents would be pulled from storage and rebranded for the current fear campaign. None of it, he said, has any relevance to actual viral biology.

He noted that even the concept of giving an antibiotic for a viral condition, which is standard practice in medicine, is structurally absurd because antibiotics work against living bacteria, and there is nothing alive in a virus. Giving an antibiotic for a virus is, in his phrase, an absurd case.

Aajonus addressed herpes specifically in the context of viral contagion. He said herpes is not contagious. Many people develop herpes, he said, but the reason is not infection from another person. It is the accumulation of metal toxins in the body. Metal toxins travel to the nerve endings, and herpes is the body's viral response to that metal contamination in those tissues. The viral activity at the nerve endings is the dissolution process addressing the metal-contaminated tissue, not a communicable disease spreading from person to person.

Aajonus consistently presented bacterial, fungal, and parasitical detoxification as far preferable to viral detoxification, and encouraged dietary and lifestyle practices that support the living detoxification systems. When bacteria, fungi, or parasites perform the cleansing work, they reduce the contaminated matter to one to five percent of its original volume. The janitors eat the matter, convert it, and leave behind a small, manageable waste product. The toxicity is genuinely reduced.

When a virus performs the same task, the total volume of toxicity is distributed through the body's fluid systems rather than reduced. The dissolved cellular contents, combined with the solvent itself, become a large mass of contaminated fluid that must be flushed out through every available elimination route. The body does not reduce the toxin load; it dilutes it and then must expend additional resources eliminating it.

He described the difference metaphorically as the difference between a vacuum cleaner and a mop. Bacteria and parasites act like a vacuum cleaner, removing matter and leaving the surface clean. A virus acts like a janitor who comes in with a tub of cleaning water and dilutes the dust and dirt into mud, spreading it everywhere. The room is not clean; the contamination has been redistributed.

Because viral detoxification is so much more burdensome, the body prefers not to use it unless absolutely forced to. In a healthy, low-toxicity body with active bacterial and fungal communities, viral detoxification is rare. In an industrialized, chemically saturated, antibiotic-compromised body, it becomes the primary detoxification route by default, because the living detoxifiers cannot operate in the toxic conditions of those cells.

Aajonus drew a specific comparison between bacterial meningitis and viral meningitis to illustrate the difference in severity. He said the medical community itself recognizes this distinction: bacterial meningitis, while serious, is comparatively manageable because the bacterial process is efficient and waste is minimized. Viral meningitis is more dangerous because the viral solvent process creates large volumes of contaminated fluid in the meningeal space, causing extreme swelling. That swelling in the meningeal tissue creates pressure on the consciousness center, raising the risk of coma, aneurysm, or ruptured blood vessels in the brain.

His protocol recommendation for severe viral headache, where the headache is intensifying, was to lie on the back and place two hot water bottles on either side of the head. He specified that true rubber hot water bottles are preferable to plastic because plastic outgases into the heat.

Aajonus described his own body as having gone through viral detoxification rather than bacterial or parasitical detoxification during his period of illness because of the extreme toxicity accumulated from his cancer treatments. He had received radiation therapy with contrast agents including barium and iodine to make the radiation more effective, and he had been administered AZT. These substances made his tissue so toxic that bacteria and parasites could not survive in it. He described himself as a chemical toxic waste dump where no bacteria or parasites could thrive. His body therefore had to accomplish its cleansing the slow, hard way, through viral detoxification, which he said takes far longer and involves far more systemic toxic fluid to manage.

This personal history informed his understanding of the viral process from the inside, and he said that having gone through it himself gave him direct knowledge of how burdensome viral detoxification is compared to the cleaner bacterial and parasitical alternatives.

---