Elimination

The stomach lining stores enormous quantities of poisons, including almost everything that has ever been injected into the body. Aajonus explained this by noting that the stomach produces hydrochloric acid yet does not dissolve its own tissue, making it one of the few organs that survives relatively intact in autopsies and exhumed bodies. Because of this unusual resistance, the body selects the stomach lining as a primary repository for toxins it cannot immediately process, including vaccine adjuvants and pharmaceutical residues.

The body cannot allow these stored poisons to remain indefinitely. If they accumulate to the point where the stomach lining becomes overwhelmed, hydrochloric acid production is compromised and the stomach stops working properly. So the body releases the poisons in trace amounts into food every time a person eats or drinks anything, poisoning the meal incrementally and causing those toxins to recirculate through the entire system, damaging tissues further with every cycle.

Aajonus documented this dumping process directly by passing tubes into the stomachs of patients, both in clinical settings and among volunteers who agreed to the procedure for experimental purposes. Over a twelve-year period, he measured gastric fluid from approximately twelve people. Before eating, the fluid contained relatively few toxins. As soon as food entered the stomach, poisons began flooding the gastric fluid immediately. The dumping was continuous for approximately ten to fifteen minutes after eating commenced. If the person stopped eating within one minute of starting, the dumping continued for ten minutes and then ceased, giving a thirty-five-minute window before the body would begin dumping again if eating resumed. If eating continued past that initial period, the body would dump continuously and without pause.

This ten-minute cessation and twenty-five-minute grace period was found to be consistent across all twelve subjects and was described by Aajonus as working "like clockwork." The implication is that the body behaves as though it is monitoring food intake and using the presence of food as a vehicle for poison disposal. When food is no longer being added, the body stops the dump because there is nothing to carry the poisons out.

Aajonus developed a protocol based on this dumping cycle that uses raw cheese to absorb the toxins before they can be reabsorbed into the body along with the meal. The mechanism is that raw cheese, because it is a highly concentrated protein and fat matrix, acts like a sponge as it moves through the digestive tract. Aajonus described it as moving "like a train" through the stomach and intestines, picking up the poisons that have been dumped into the gastric environment.

The standard recommendation was to eat a tablespoon or two of raw cheese first thing in the morning, before any other food. A larger person might consume three tablespoons. This cheese would absorb the poisons that had accumulated and been dumped overnight. After the cheese was eaten, the person was to wait ten minutes before consuming anything else. During those ten minutes, the body would complete its dumping cycle and cease. Then the person could eat a regular meal with twenty-five minutes of relatively clean digestion before the dumping cycle would restart, assuming eating continued past that window.

If a meal ran longer than twenty-five minutes, the person could pause eating, eat another piece of cheese, wait ten minutes again, and then resume eating for another twenty-five-minute clean window. This could be repeated in cycles throughout a longer meal. The same principle applied to nausea: much of what people experience as nausea is the result of heavy toxin dumping into the stomach. Eating cheese during a nausea episode absorbs those poisons and reduces the sensation substantially.

Aajonus recounted discovering the cheese intervention after someone poisoned his milk approximately six years before the point at which he described the event in one transcript. He began eating cheese to absorb the contamination and noticed it reduced his nausea by ninety percent. He then tested the approach with fifty people with consistent success and subsequently expanded it to approximately two hundred people before incorporating it into his regular recommendations.

Vomiting is described by Aajonus as the single most efficient and concentrated method the body has for expelling poisons. He stated explicitly that vomit carries a higher concentration of toxins out of the body faster than any other elimination pathway. Rather than being a sign of illness or failure, vomiting in his framework is a healthy and often necessary process, particularly during active detoxification or cancer reversal.

He cited the case of a woman named Owanza who was recovering from sixty-three tumors. During certain phases of her recovery, she vomited up to eleven times daily in cycles lasting up to five weeks. She eventually recovered, and the process took eleven years. The vomiting was interpreted as the body dumping concentrated toxins through the stomach and expelling them rather than allowing them to be reabsorbed.

Aajonus described his own experience with vomiting during heavy detoxification as excruciating in terms of the physical effort involved, but he noted that after such episodes he felt like a different person and recovered his energy rapidly. He connected this to the principle that vomiting allows the body to eliminate concentrations of poisons that would otherwise take weeks or months to clear through slower pathways.

In the context of the drug detoxification protocol using alternating beef and oranges, Aajonus also noted that vomiting is "beneficial and the quickest and easiest way for the body to eliminate drugs after they have dumped into the stomach." During that protocol, drugs stored in the body are mobilized and some are dumped directly into the stomach, where they can either be absorbed by food and carried out or be expelled through vomiting.

For people doing active detoxification cleanses, Aajonus recommended not suppressing vomiting. He framed the desire to stop vomiting as counterproductive to the elimination process. If cheese is available, it can reduce the nausea and the dumping volume, slowing and moderating the process. But if vomit occurs, he said, a person should "rejoice" rather than resist it.

Aajonus described human bowel habits as relatively inefficient compared to the elimination capacity of microbes. A person eating approximately seven pounds of food per day will typically produce three-quarters of a pound to one pound of fecal matter. This represents a large proportion of the consumed material being excreted, and it also means a significant loss of nutrients because the body must bind good nutrients to bad material in order to carry waste out of the system.

He contrasted this with parasite-assisted elimination, in which parasites consume up to one hundred times their own weight in a twelve to twenty-four hour period and produce only one to five percent of that consumed mass as waste. A parasite eating the equivalent of one hundred pounds of damaged cellular material would leave only one pound of fecal matter for the body to clear. Bacteria were described as consuming approximately fifty times their weight in twenty-four hours with approximately five percent waste, which is still dramatically more efficient than the body's own unaided elimination. Fungi consume approximately forty times their weight in twenty-four hours, though their waste ratio is higher than that of parasites or bacteria.

The practical implication Aajonus drew from these numbers is that microbially assisted elimination dramatically reduces the burden on the lymphatic system and on the body's nutrient reserves. If a parasite handles one hundred pounds of dead and damaged cells and leaves only one to five pounds for the lymph system to process and expel, the body preserves nutrients and energy that would otherwise be consumed managing one hundred pounds of waste directly.

In the context of healthy animals, Aajonus noted that coyotes eating a whole rabbit might produce only two small bowel movements, demonstrating much greater efficiency than humans. He attributed much of the human inefficiency to the toxicity accumulated from cooked foods, medications, vaccines, and environmental chemicals that require additional nutrient binding to clear.

The most detailed dimension of Aajonus's teaching on elimination concerns the role of bacteria, parasites, and fungi as the body's preferred cleaning agents. His position, stated repeatedly across multiple workshop transcripts, is that these organisms are not pathogens to be killed but essential workers that perform the elimination of damaged, dead, and decaying cellular material at an efficiency the body cannot achieve through any other means.

Bacteria, parasites, and fungi can consume degenerated or dead cells rapidly, and the volume of waste they produce constitutes only a fraction of the volume of the original toxic material. When these organisms are available and functioning in a body with sufficient nutritional support, the elimination of cellular debris is efficient and the resulting waste is small and manageable. When they are absent, killed by antibiotics, dewormers, or pharmaceuticals, the body must resort to viruses, which are not living organisms but crystalline solvents manufactured within poisonous toxic cells. Unlike microbial cleaners, viral solvents do not reduce the volume of waste; instead, they dissolve cellular matter into a large volume of toxic fluid that distributes throughout the body, making elimination far more difficult and the detoxification process far more damaging.

The specificity of this principle was illustrated through the animal experiments Aajonus described. In one experiment, animals diagnosed with parasites were divided into three groups. The first group, fed kibble and canned food with pharmaceutical dewormers, saw approximately sixty percent mortality. The group fed kibble and canned food with herbal or homeopathic dewormers saw approximately forty percent mortality, with survivors recovering without vitality. The second group, fed raw foods with pharmaceutical dewormers, showed reduced mortality of ten to twenty-five percent. The second group fed raw foods with herbal or homeopathic dewormers showed similar reduced mortality. The third group, fed only raw foods with no dewormers at all, had no deaths and recovered fully, though the recovery took longer because the parasites had to address not only the immediate infestation but all the prior damage.

At autopsy, animals in the dewormer groups showed blackened or browned internal organs at the sites of parasite activity. An animal that had a liver parasite and was given dewormers had a black liver at death. An animal in the no-dewormer raw food group that was allowed to carry the same liver parasite had a liver described as "young, beautiful, brilliant, healthy" at the equivalent point. The parasites, by eating the damaged tissue, had cleaned and restored the organ rather than destroyed it.

The efficiency ratios Aajonus cited repeatedly were: parasites eating one hundred times their weight in twelve to twenty-four hours with one to five percent waste; bacteria eating fifty times their weight in twenty-four to forty-eight hours with five percent waste; fungi eating approximately forty times their weight in twenty-four hours with higher but still significantly reduced waste. These figures were used to argue that the body, when it has access to these organisms and the nutritional resources to sustain them, performs elimination with extraordinary precision and economy.

Aajonus described at length the work of a gastroenterologist who observed a striking contrast between pigs raised in a sterile university environment and pigs on a farm. The farm pigs, eating their own feces and urine along with slop, carried trichinosis and whipworm in their intestines and were thriving, robust, and healthy. The university pigs, kept in a sterile environment and given what was considered optimal care, were sluggish and sick.

The gastroenterologist examined both groups and found that the farm pigs had whipworm in their small intestines where the organism facilitated digestion, and the university pigs had none. He then infused whipworm taken from the farm pigs into the intestines of the university pigs. Within five days, the university pigs were energetic and well.

Aajonus connected this directly to human intestinal disease. He described a physician who gave whipworm eggs dissolved in Gatorade to six human patients who had suffered from intractable intestinal problems for periods ranging from ten to thirty-two years. The Gatorade was used because it is alkalinizing, which neutralized the hydrochloric acid in the stomach long enough for the eggs to survive passage and incubate in the intestinal tract. Five of the six patients recovered within five days. One did not respond, and the reasons were not fully established in the data Aajonus had access to. The five who recovered had experienced conditions including constant gas from the rectum or stomach, intestinal cramping with any food intake, chronic diarrhea, and chronic vomiting, all of which ceased after the whipworm became established.

Aajonus described similar findings from a separate experiment involving the introduction of trichinosis into animals that had been failing to digest food properly. In that case, the trichinosis predigested food for the animals, making nutrients available when the animals' own intestinal bacteria were incapable of managing digestion properly. The animals' vomiting, diarrhea, and general digestive failure stopped within five days of the parasite becoming established.

In the context of the drug detoxification protocol, the dumping mechanism functions differently than in everyday eating. During the beef and orange detox protocol, stored pharmaceutical compounds are mobilized from tissues throughout the body and some are dumped directly into the stomach. Aajonus emphasized that during this protocol, eating should occur only when the stomach is completely empty, because eating while drugs are being dumped into the stomach, or eating in a way that mixes the beef and orange before one has fully digested, causes indigestion, increases nausea, and can trigger vomiting. He noted that vomiting during this protocol is beneficial because it represents the most direct expulsion of the mobilized drugs.

Aajonus described a personal experience in which, having eaten approximately one pound of salmon heavily infested with pinworms, he expected to pass the parasites in his feces and urine for weeks afterward. He estimated he had consumed several hundred thousand eggs and possibly two thousand active pinworms. Yet for the full ten weeks he monitored his waste, not one parasite appeared. He attributed this to the extreme toxicity remaining in his body from prior chemotherapy and radiation treatment. The parasites could not sustain themselves in his tissues because every cell they consumed had been damaged by radiation or pharmaceutical toxicity, and the poisoned environment killed them before they could reproduce.

He used this observation to explain why his body was forced to use viruses rather than microbial agents for its cleanup work at that point in his recovery. The parasites, which would normally have been the most efficient elimination agents, were being killed by the residual toxicity they were attempting to eat. This left the body without its preferred biological janitors and forced it to rely on the far less efficient viral solvent mechanism.

Aajonus described a personal incident in which he was staying in Hanoi and developed a craving for raw onion, eating half an onion like an apple. Approximately six hours later, he experienced intense diarrhea and passed forty-eight feet of tapeworm in one episode. He pulled the tapeworm from the toilet and spread it across the floor of the hotel room to measure it, noting that it shrank rapidly after expulsion and measured approximately forty-five feet by the time he finished. He described this passage as natural and unremarkable, noting that tapeworms exist in human bodies only under conditions of excessive sugar intake and serve to break down carbohydrates into more utilizable forms when the body's own digestive enzymes, insulin, and nutrients are insufficient to handle the carbohydrate load.

Aajonus referenced his own experience during a period of living on water fasting while ill in the desert, when he was drinking two gallons of water a day and doing daily enemas to prevent headaches. He described this as a phase when constipation was a constant problem even with the enemas, and the headaches and nausea persisted regardless. This context was used to contrast the limitations of water-based elimination with the far more effective biological pathways through food and microbial activity.

Aajonus consistently connected the quality of elimination to the overall nutritional state of the body. He noted that eggs pull poisons out of the tissues and into the stomach, but if a person does not have enough nutrients in the blood to handle the poisons once they are mobilized, the result is an energy crash and nausea. The solution was not to avoid eggs but to accompany them with cream and honey, or to use the cream shake format, so that the poisons are drawn out more slowly and the body has the nutritional buffer to manage the process.

He also noted that reducing the complexity of meat during illness shifts metabolic energy away from digestion and toward the elimination and healing process, allowing the body to focus its resources on dumping and clearing toxins rather than on the enzymatic demands of complex food breakdown.

Raw dairy was described as a key tool for moderating and supporting the elimination process because it provides nutrients that bind with mobilized toxins and carries them through the digestive tract without allowing reabsorption. The more milk consumed in a given session, the more poisons were drawn to the stomach. Cheese, being a concentrated dairy product, performed the absorption function without stimulating further dumping.

In the context of cancer, Aajonus identified vomiting as a "very healthy aspect of cancer reversal in many instances." His reasoning was that as tumors dissolve and toxic compounds are mobilized from tumor tissue, they are dumped into the stomach for rapid expulsion. The fact that the body selects vomiting as the route rather than slower pathways indicates the urgency and concentration of the material being cleared. The case of Owanza, who recovered from sixty-three tumors over eleven years with intermittent daily vomiting cycles of up to eleven times per day for weeks at a time, was used as the primary example of how sustained, intense elimination through vomiting can accompany genuine systemic recovery.