DNA

One of the most detailed contexts in which Aajonus discussed DNA was in his explanation of what viruses actually are. He argued that viruses are not living organisms. They have no nucleus, no respiratory system, no digestive system, no circulatory system, and no nervous system. What they do contain is RNA and DNA, and this is the key to understanding their function rather than their nature as threats. Viruses are solvents, or what he also called enzyme fractionators, produced by individual cells when those cells cannot use bacteria, molds, or parasites to clean out damaged or toxic tissue. The RNA and sometimes the DNA attached to these solvents serves a directional function: it tells the solvent what kind of tissue to dissolve. Without that RNA or DNA address, the solvent could dissolve indiscriminately. The DNA present in a virus is there because the cell used substances from within itself, including its own DNA components, to synthesize that solvent. It is cellular debris, not a living agent.

He stated this directly: "Virus contain DNA because cells have used substances within themselves to synthesize virus; DNA is a part of that." When the cleansing and healing process ends, cells stop producing large amounts of virus. The DNA and RNA present in viral material are therefore waste byproducts of the fractionation process, residues of dissolved tissue rather than indicators of a living, replicating entity.

Science itself, he noted, has demonstrated that viruses are not alive, that they are predominantly protein but contain organic DNA, that they increase only in the presence of live cells, and that they cause certain cells or parts of cells to dissolve. The contested claim, which he rejected as unproven, is that viruses are non-discriminatingly destructive things that self-replicate. He compared this to saying that laundry soap self-replicates because it is found in homes. If you place what is called a virus, meaning protein bodies along with RNA and DNA fragments from tissue, into a fertile petri dish kept incubated and alive, not one extra particle is produced. Only when live cells are added does multiplication appear to occur. That multiplication, he argued, comes from the cells themselves continuing to produce more solvent in response to ongoing toxic conditions, not from the viral material reproducing on its own.

Aajonus explained that each cell type in the body, whether liver, heart, pancreas, spleen, nerve, neuron, lymph, artery, or muscle, has a specific DNA pattern. If cellular waste containing heart-cell DNA and RNA were found, that would constitute a specific and identifiable category. Within heart cells alone, there are muscle cells, nerve cells, lymph cells, connective cells, reproductive cells, and blood cells, each of which is heart-specific and each of which carries particular DNA and RNA. The medical and pharmaceutical industries, he argued, take these categories of cellular waste, including their DNA and RNA signatures, and name and categorize them as viruses that attack the body. This naming process creates what he described as the monster that pharma and medicine need in order to keep people in fear and seeking their treatments.

He said that this understanding of cell-specific DNA means there are approximately 300,000 different viruses that can be formed in the human body, because differing cells need different enzyme fractionators to do the dissolution work. A liver cell produces a different fractionator from a pancreatic cell, which differs from a nerve cell. All of them are cellularly produced. None of them are living external invaders.

The bacterial-to-human DNA ratio carried significant implications throughout Aajonus's framework. He stated that 150 bacterial genes exist for every one human gene, and therefore the human body is 99.5 percent bacteria. Bacteria perform every function of the body: cleansing, building, disassembling food, strengthening, energy production, hormone production, and all other processes. He noted that in fluorescent and iridescent animals, bacteria produce the light-generating mechanisms, and that the thyroid and all hormone systems function because of bacterial activity.

He described digestion as 90 percent bacterial, explaining that digestive juices such as hydrochloric acid do not dissolve food in the manner of muriatic acid but rather fractionate molecules so that bacteria can enter and consume the particles. If all food were liquid, he said, no digestive juices would even be necessary, only bacteria. The bacterial genes in the digestive tract outnumber human digestive genes by 150 to 1, and he concluded that digestion is 99.5 percent bacterial and only about 1 percent the product of human digestive juices.

He emphasized the evolutionary timeline: the humanoid has been around for at least a million years, and everything started from bacteria. Two years before one workshop, the ratio was stated as 100 bacterial genes to every one human gene, but six months before that same workshop it had been updated to 150 bacterial genes per human gene, with biological evidence supporting the increase. He used this data to argue that bacteria are not the body's problem or threat but rather the very substance of which the body is composed and by which the body operates.

On the question of hereditary genetics more broadly, Aajonus held that appearance and behavior will be similar to one's parents and ancestors, but that the role of genes is much more one of choice and active expression than of fixed fate. He compared the genetic potential of healthy individuals to a formidable athletic team: the players are not simply coded to function well but have natural ability and skill that are integral parts of their beings and bodies. It is not simply code but energy, innate intelligence, and ability coupled with muscular health that determines expression.

However, he acknowledged that this active energy process is disrupted when industrial chemicals and the free radicals they produce interfere with it. He described vaccines specifically as causing mutant antibodies that do not go dormant for up to decades. These mutant antibodies remain active long after the disease or virus that triggered them becomes inactive, and they eat sub-particles from the inside of amino acids in the blood, rendering those proteins unstable. Because amino acids are the primary building blocks of cells, the consequence is cellular malnutrition, and in all animals, that malnutrition causes gradual genetic mutations resulting in weaknesses, diseases, malfunctions, and deformities. Autism, he said, increased 800 to 1,000 times its previous rate due to mercury in vaccines, and that mercury also causes severe damage to the neurological system, dissolving neurons as demonstrated in time-lapse video from the University of Alberta.

He also noted the particular vulnerability associated with pregnancy: women who have not eaten a raw food diet for at least seven years before having a child, and who did not grow up on raw food, give up seven to eight years of their lives with each child, because the toxic burden on both the mother and the developing fetus is that much greater. The implication is that genetically compromised or weakened DNA expression in children is tied directly to the chemical environment of the mother before and during pregnancy.

Aajonus discussed several cases in which he believed DNA had been artificially spliced or genetically modified to produce organisms that do not occur in nature. The most detailed case involved AIDS. He described the work of a neurologist, Dr. Strecker, who was hired by an insurance company to evaluate the relationship between illness and AIDS in a company with 60 percent homosexual employees. Strecker fractionated the AIDS virus using an enzyme that normally separates a virus into five parts. Instead, the AIDS virus split in two every time, across one thousand attempts. The only way a virus fractionates into two parts rather than five, Aajonus stated, is if it has been spliced together by human engineering. Strecker took the two opposite sides, fused them together, and found that he had the lymphonomic virus of a sheep fused with the leukemic virus of a bovine. He generated 15 possible name combinations for this disease and went to UCLA, where the very first name he had chosen appeared in the computer files. AIDS had been created there in 1961 and 1962 to produce cancer in laboratory animals for cancer research. The research was given to the War Department as a possible biological warfare agent.

He described a similar finding with E. coli O157:H7. When he obtained a sample from a university in northern California, which had obtained it from the CDC and FDA, he applied the standard fractionating enzyme that separates any natural bacteria into five parts. The O157:H7 split in two, indicating it was man-made and genetically spliced. He stated he had never been able to find O157:H7 in a factory farm or in 40 samples from spinach fields that were said to be contaminated with it. The only sample he could investigate came from institutional sources, not nature.

Both examples illustrate his broader argument that the dangerous DNA manipulations are not natural microbial activity but human engineering, and that the organisms produced by that engineering behave in ways that natural organisms do not, including fractionating abnormally when subjected to enzymatic testing.

He also raised the question of DNA testing in a research context. Discussing a study that used DNA testing to claim that drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in meat came from food animals, he asked who funded the research, why it was funded, and who stood to profit. His point was not that DNA testing is inherently invalid but that the expensive technology required for DNA research, which costs approximately two million dollars per month to maintain an idle laboratory and up to two million dollars per day when research is being conducted, is accessible only to large corporations with financial interests in the outcomes. Therefore, the conclusions of DNA-based research must always be evaluated in light of who funded the work and what they stood to gain.