Asbestos

The most detailed case Aajonus described involving asbestos directly concerned a pregnant woman who remodeled her house over a period of six months while carrying a child. He stated that she very rarely wore a mask throughout this process, and that the remodeling involved tearing out old walls, which exposed her to asbestos alongside other toxic substances. He told her at the time that the Primal Diet was not a miracle capable of overcoming that level of sustained toxic exposure, particularly during pregnancy. She disagreed, believing the exposure would not affect the baby.

The infant appeared completely healthy in all other respects, but all of the intestinal tract had been damaged. By the time the child was two years old, the accumulated damage from the particles that had gotten into the baby's digestive tract during gestation was sufficient to cause death. There was no conventional explanation given for the death. Aajonus attributed it specifically to the particles the mother had inhaled during the remodeling, which then entered fetal circulation and settled in the child's gut, where they caused progressive destruction of the intestinal tract over the first two years of life. He used this case to illustrate that no dietary protocol, however well constructed, can fully compensate for sustained inhalation of construction toxins during pregnancy.

Aajonus gave detailed practical guidance to construction workers who face regular exposure to asbestos alongside other airborne hazards common in the building industry, including metal dust, radioactive steel particles from depleted uranium-containing building materials, and heavy metals from drilling and welding. He stated that he had workers wearing masks at all times on the work site, and he added a dietary intervention on top of that physical barrier.

The protocol he described involved carrying a two-cup jar filled with small cubes of raw cheese cut to sugar-cube size, kept in a work belt pouch. He set up a timer that would go off every fifteen minutes, at which point the worker would eat one cube of cheese. That amounts to four cubes per hour throughout the entire workday. He noted that this took no more than five to ten seconds out of a worker's process at each interval, and that no one complained about the interruption because their performance actually improved. In one version of this account he described the jar protected by a thick leather pouch to prevent breakage.

The reason Aajonus used cheese for this purpose was that he found raw cheese to be among the most effective foods for absorbing and binding to inhaled and ingested metals and particulates before they could be stored in tissue. He stated specifically that when cheese was used in this way, "metal detoxification on its own without any of the other things" proceeded at a pace he found superior to other approaches. The cheese acts by attracting the metallic and mineral particles into the digestive tract in a form the body can work with, rather than allowing the particles to be absorbed into lymph or stored in organs.

He described one construction worker who had developed fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue from accumulated exposure to radioactive and metallic building materials, had been unable to work for two years, and recovered function after beginning this dietary approach. The asbestos exposure was part of the total toxic burden this worker was carrying, not the sole factor, but Aajonus grouped it with the other inhaled construction toxins as part of what the cheese protocol was designed to address continuously throughout the workday.

Aajonus described the general mechanism of inhaled particle damage in detail across many contexts, and his statements about asbestos fit within the same model. When particulates are inhaled, the body must attempt to digest them in the lungs, sinuses, bronchioles, and esophagus. If the particles cannot be coughed out or expelled through mucus, the body attempts to surround them with fat molecules and white blood cells, pull minerals to the site, and either dissolve the material or sequester it. When the material resists dissolution, it is stored. When it is stored in the digestive tract, as in the infant case, it irradiates or damages surrounding tissue progressively over time.

He observed that some particles can be carried out of the body through mucus without requiring digestion, but that this depends entirely on the nature of the material. Natural fibers from cotton, silk, wool, or linen, while still requiring some handling by mucus, behave differently from industrial particles. Asbestos and other construction particulates, like synthetic plastic fibers, cannot be expelled through normal mucus transport and require the body to attempt chemical dissolution, which produces its own damaging byproducts and depletes the resources available for the process.

The lymph glands in the chest and breast region bear particular responsibility for managing what is inhaled. Aajonus noted this in the context of other inhaled toxins, describing how lymph glands in that area attempt to sequester particles from the lungs, and how sustained exposure ultimately overwhelms their capacity. While he made this observation most explicitly in cases involving thallium and metal vapors rather than asbestos, the anatomical logic he applied was identical.

Aajonus noted that asbestos exposure in older buildings was not limited to construction workers and pregnant women undertaking renovations. He referenced the case of the entire school population in the San Fernando Valley and adjacent areas suffering from symptoms caused by asbestos in school buildings. He stated that after many decades of exposure, the schools had to be gradually reconstructed, and that he had at least one teacher who came to him as a patient and still suffered from the effects of her past asbestos exposure, even after the buildings had been remediated.

This framing treated asbestos as a chronic low-level environmental toxin capable of producing lasting illness in people who spent time in contaminated buildings over the course of years, not just in those who worked directly with construction materials. He used this to reinforce his broader point that toxic building materials are a significant contributor to rates of serious disease, and that cleaning, demolition, and renovation all represent moments of heightened exposure requiring protective measures such as masks.

He stated directly: "When you clean, wear a mask. So if any of these dusts and particles fall from paint or whatever it is, you're not inhaling it because your body will have to deal with it." This was offered as a practical instruction applicable to asbestos and all other particles that can become airborne during routine building maintenance or renovation.

Within Aajonus's broader framework, asbestos sat alongside the full list of industrial toxins he considered responsible for the chronic disease epidemic in industrialized countries. He did not single asbestos out as uniquely dangerous above all other construction hazards, but he treated it as one of several serious particulate threats that accumulate in the body when inhaled repeatedly. The others he grouped it with explicitly included metal dust, radioactive building materials, and heavy metal vapors from welding and smelting.

His position was that the body can manage a low level of these exposures when given adequate nutritional support, but that without that support, and particularly without the continuous protein and mineral binding that raw cheese provides, the particles accumulate faster than the body can clear them. The two-year death of the infant, the chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia of the construction worker, and the ongoing symptoms of the teacher from the San Fernando Valley schools were all presented as illustrations of what happens when accumulation proceeds without adequate dietary or protective countermeasures.

---